martes, 2 de octubre de 2018

GENDERED LANGUAGE

Topic   is language  gendered ?


What It Really Means To Call A Woman Hysterical

by Kory Stamper

published September 25th, 2018

Is hysterical a gendered insult?

It began, unsurprisingly, on cable TV.
In 2017, the Senate intelligence committee called Attorney General Jeff Sessions to testify about his Russian contacts as well as conversations about those contacts with Donald Trump prior to the 2016 general election. The hearings were widely discussed, as were all things having to do with Russia, but they led to an odd exchange on cable TV about how Senator Kamala Harris was questioning Sessions.
The CNN analysis of the hearings included a back-and-forth between Jason Miller, former Trump advisor, and Kirsten Powers, a CNN political analyst, wherein Miller claimed that Sessions had done a good job batting away Harris’s “hysteria.” Powers jumped in:
Powers: How was Senator Kamala Harris hysterical? I don’t understand that. She was asking some tough questions—
Miller: [cross-talk] … completely partisan screed—
Powers: But how was that “hysterical”?
Miller: From my, I would say, objective perspective, it didn’t seem like there was any effort to try to get to a real question or to the bottom of things.
Powers: I think she asked a lot of questions. She was very dogged. I wouldn’t say she was any more dogged than Senator Ron Wyden was, would you say that?
Miller: My opinion on that, I think she was hysterical. I don’t think Senator Wyden was trying to get to the bottom of answers either.
Powers: But he wasn’t hysterical, she was. Okay, I just wanted to clear that up. Got it.
Miller: She was trying to shout down Attorney Sessions, which is way out of bounds—
Powers: She didn’t shout, actually, but even if she did, I’m just saying that they both were asking a lot of tough questions and I think calling her “hysterical” is probably a little gendered thing to say.
The exchange continued, and analysis of the analysis resulted in a number of claims supporting Powers’s charge that calling Harris hysterical amounted to a gendered insult. But, of course, some pooh-poohed the claim, pointing to dictionary definitions of the word as evidence that such a notion is political correctness run amok. They claimed the word has been used of men! It can mean “funny”—how is that an insult?!

Lexicographers to the rescue

Most people assume that lexicography primarily involves being philosophical about language while lounging in a leather armchair. (Don’t you all get too jealous at once.) But, in fact, good lexicography is based on rigorous data analysis that uses all the tools at our disposal. And, a proper lexicographical analysis can actually tell you whether a word like hysterical has gendered use or not. So … let’s dive in.

Meet the raw materials

We start with a corpus, or a curated database of full-text sources. For this analysis, I used the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) at Brigham Young University. COCA is an excellent linguistic resource for analysis like this, because it’s large (it contains over 560 million words), balanced (it includes as wide a range of language as possible, from spoken English to academic English), and tagged (the words in the corpus have been analyzed and given a part of speech label). It also happens to only include sources from 1990 onward, which means that our analysis is only taking into account current linguistic usage.
We also need to start with some basic parameters about what we mean by gendered. In this particular case, we want to sort the uses of hysterical by the gender of the person being called hysterical or the gender of the person who is doing the thing labeled as hysterical (like crying or laughing).

Get collocative

A search for hysterical in COCA returns over 6,000 hits, which is quite a bit … even for a lexicographer to sort through. Rather than read through each hit, we can analyze common patterns of use by searching for collocates of hysterical, or for words that are commonly paired with the word hysterical. I narrowed the search for collocates down to the top 100 nouns that appear within four words of hysterical, and then sorted them by frequency.
This gives us a more manageable sample size: a little over 1,000 hits. The ten most common nouns that follow hysterical are, in order of frequency, laughter, woman, people, crying, laugh, tears, mother, women, girl, and time. The ten most common nouns that precede hysterical are, in order of frequency, people, mother, voice, kind, woman, man, word, women, room, and girl.
The first thing that jumps out is that female-tagged nouns like women, girl, andmother show up on that list much more frequently than male-tagged nouns like man. That proves, right off the bat, that the word hysterical gets applied to female subjects more than male subjects.
But those numbers, you could argue, don’t prove anything. What if the use is actually “Don’t call women ‘hysterical’,” or “men can be hysterical”? And, what about the weird words that show up in those lists, like room and time? You’re right, that is weird. Which is why I sorted the words as either male-tagged, female-tagged, mixed-gender (or gender not specified), and abstracted (for non-human words or for all uses of hysterical to mean “funny”). You’re welcome. Here are the results:
MALEFEMALEMIXEDABSTRACTED
hysterical + noun (up to four positions out)9631415287
noun + hysterical (up to four positions out)441837863
TOTALS140497230150
Numbers don’t lie: hysterical is used with female words 49% of the time. Now, compare that to how often it’s used with male words (14% of the time) or mixed groups (23% of the time).

Digging deeper into hysterical data

But, how can we know that’s a good measure? After all, the dictionary says that hysterical can mean “funny”! And, men do get called hysterical, too!
We can crunch the data even more to show other ways that hysterical is biased. I assigned each noun a type: person for nouns that were clearly people; actionfor nouns that described an action like laughter or crying; and thing for nouns that didn’t really describe either of those. Then, each noun was analyzed to see if women are described as hysterical criers more than men, for instance.
Looking at the person-typed nouns yields a few surprises. The most common nouns that follow hysterical are mostly female: woman, mother, women, girl, man, men, wife, girls, person, and mom. But, you cry: man, men, and person! Be careful: just because a word appears near hysterical doesn’t mean it’s the word being modified by hysterical.
If you read through those uses, you’ll see plenty of sentences like “She was hysterical and the men calmed her down”—uses of men near hysterical that nonetheless have a female referent hidden in the context. In fact, of the 21 sentences that use man, men, or person near hysterical, 13 are female-tagged, six are male-tagged, and two are mixed or gender not known. Sneaky, sneaky.
Looking at the action words, here are the top words listed alphabetically and with their male-female tally:
WORD NEAR HYSTERICALMALE-TAGGEDFEMALE-TAGGED
cackle2
crying/cries817
fear14
fits2
giggle/giggles9
glee5
joy3
laughter/laugh1836
outburst/outbursts6
panic3
rage5
relief22
screams/screaming7
sobs15
tears314
violence1
While both men and women laugh hysterically (good thing, too), women cry, sob, scream, rage, panic, giggle, and burst in to tears hysterically far more than men do. When men are hysterical, it’s with glee or joy; when women are hysterical, it’s with outbursts, violence, and fits.

Hysterical beginnings

How did we come to this point? The origins of hysterical have something to do with it. Hysterical’s earliest meaning was “of, relating to, or characterized by hysteria,” and while we now think of hysteria as irrational panic, it was, for centuries, a medical diagnosis. Hysteria comes from the Greek hysterikós, which means “suffering in the womb.”
So, yeah, the ancient Greeks believed that when a woman was behaving irrationally—or in a way that they considered to be irrational—it was because her uterus was literally wandering around her body causing trouble. (The belief that the uterus was a free-floating organ persisted into the late Middle Ages.) A number of ailments and attitudes were blamed on hysteria, including nervousness, fainting, irritability, anxiety, boldness or outspokenness, sexual desire, and—no joke—the suffragist movement.
Charges of hysteria didn’t end with women getting the vote, either: the American Psychological Association still allowed the diagnosis of “hysterical neurosis” as late as 1980.
And this should, perhaps, give us some pause before we call someone “hysterical.” The word’s origin ties it to the idea that any show of emotion or force from a woman is evidence of her fragility and inherent instability, and echoes of that are still present in its uses today. When I ask you to picture someone hysterically crying, or screaming hysterically, you will most likely picture a woman who is out of control. That’s not a personal failing; that’s evidence that we’ve been conditioned to associate hysterical with women.
In the rare cases when hysterical is used of men, it’s usually used to describe either a mental or emotional point of no reasonable, safe return: a vet with PTSD who has a hysterical psychotic break, for instance, or a hysterical grieving father who needs to be sedated lest he hurt himself. Hysterical then becomes a brush that can be used to tar men as unstable, weak, or dangerous—even in instances where they are being completely reasonable:
But, what about the “funny” sense? Surely that’s a positive use we don’t have to shy away from?
Nope. Even the “funny” sense of hysterical usually connotes a loss of control, as in the original hysteria: a hysterical joke or comedian makes you laugh uncontrollably, sometimes sob, just absolutely lose it. It’s the sunny inverse of an emotional breakdown, but the breakdown is still implied. (It’s worth noting that when hysterical is used to refer to funny people—the word’s only “positive” use—it’s most often used of men.)

So, is hysterical gendered?

The evidence is overwhelming that hysterical is used most often in reference to women, and that most of the female-tilted uses of hysterical refer to actions that are negative in connotation or meaning. You’d be hard-pressed to look at the data and come to any other conclusion.
What can we do to get people to stop calling women hysterical? Change begins at home: when hysterical slips out of your mouth, think about how you’ve used it and whether you can substitute another less-loaded word for it. Try “she’s ridiculously funny,” or “a frenzied outburst,” or “uncontrollable glee.” Say that someone is overwrought or frantic or agitated.
And, when people tell you that you’re being hysterical about hysterical, throw some cold, hard data their way.

Read other articles by Kory Stamper:
Kory Stamper was a lexicographer at Merriam-Webster for almost twenty years, and she is the author of the best-selling Word by Word: The Secret Life of Dictionaries, which chronicles the twists and turns of dictionary making and the English language. She is also the co-host of Fiat Lex, a podcast about dictionaries, and she is working on a book about defining color. She lives in New Jersey with her dog and far too many dictionaries.

viernes, 28 de septiembre de 2018

history of the english language

ENGLISH .... WHERE DOES IT COME FROM ?

ORIGINS OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE


History of English

This page is a short history of the origins and development of the English language
The history of the English language really started with the arrival of three Germanic tribes who invaded Britain during the 5th century AD. These tribes, the Angles, the Saxons and the Jutes, crossed the North Sea from what today is Denmark and northern Germany. At that time the inhabitants of Britain spoke a Celtic language. But most of the Celtic speakers were pushed west and north by the invaders - mainly into what is now Wales, Scotland and Ireland. The Angles came from "Englaland" [sic] and their language was called "Englisc" - from which the words "England" and "English" are derived.
Map of Germanic invasions
Germanic invaders entered Britain on the east and south coasts in the 5th century

Old English (450-1100 AD)

The invading Germanic tribes spoke similar languages, which in Britain developed into what we now call Old English. Old English did not sound or look like English today. Native English speakers now would have great difficulty understanding Old English. Nevertheless, about half of the most commonly used words in Modern English have Old English roots. The words be, strongand water, for example, derive from Old English. Old English was spoken until around 1100.
Example of Old English
Part of Beowulf, a poem written in Old English

Middle English (1100-1500)

In 1066 William the Conqueror, the Duke of Normandy (part of modern France), invaded and conquered England. The new conquerors (called the Normans) brought with them a kind of French, which became the language of the Royal Court, and the ruling and business classes. For a period there was a kind of linguistic class division, where the lower classes spoke English and the upper classes spoke French. In the 14th century English became dominant in Britain again, but with many French words added. This language is called Middle English. It was the language of the great poet Chaucer (c1340-1400), but it would still be difficult for native English speakers to understand today.
Example of Middle English
An example of Middle English by Chaucer

Modern English

Early Modern English (1500-1800)

Towards the end of Middle English, a sudden and distinct change in pronunciation (the Great Vowel Shift) started, with vowels being pronounced shorter and shorter. From the 16th century the British had contact with many peoples from around the world.
This, and the Renaissance of Classical learning, meant that many new words and phrases entered the language. The invention of printing also meant that there was now a common language in print. Books became cheaper and more people learned to read. Printing also brought standardization to English. Spelling and grammar became fixed, and the dialect of London, where most publishing houses were, became the standard. In 1604 the first English dictionary was published.
Example of Early Modern English
Hamlet's famous "To be, or not to be" lines, written in Early Modern English by Shakespeare

Late Modern English (1800-Present)

The main difference between Early Modern English and Late Modern English is vocabulary. Late Modern English has many more words, arising from two principal factors: firstly, the Industrial Revolution and technology created a need for new words; secondly, the British Empire at its height covered one quarter of the earth's surface, and the English language adopted foreign words from many countries.

Varieties of English

From around 1600, the English colonization of North America resulted in the creation of a distinct American variety of English. Some English pronunciations and words "froze" when they reached America. In some ways, American English is more like the English of Shakespeare than modern British English is. Some expressions that the British call "Americanisms" are in fact original British expressions that were preserved in the colonies while lost for a time in Britain (for example trash for rubbish, loan as a verb instead of lend, and fall for autumn; another example, frame-up, was re-imported into Britain through Hollywood gangster movies). Spanish also had an influence on American English (and subsequently British English), with words like canyon, ranch, stampede and vigilante being examples of Spanish words that entered English through the settlement of the American West. French words (through Louisiana) and West African words (through the slave trade) also influenced American English (and so, to an extent, British English).
Today, American English is particularly influential, due to the USA's dominance of cinema, television, popular music, trade and technology (including the Internet). But there are many other varieties of English around the world, including for example Australian English, New Zealand English, Canadian English, South African English, Indian English and Caribbean English.
The Germanic Family of Languages
Chart of the Germanic family of languages
English is a member of the Germanic family of languages. Germanic is a branch of the Indo-European language family.
A brief chronology of English
55 BCRoman invasion of Britain by Julius CaesarLocal
inhabitants
speak
Celtish
AD 43Roman invasion and occupation. Beginning of Roman rule of Britain
436Roman withdrawal from Britain complete
449Settlement of Britain by Germanic invaders begins
450-480Earliest known Old English inscriptionsOld
English
1066William the Conqueror, Duke of Normandy, invades and conquers England
c1150Earliest surviving manuscripts in Middle EnglishMiddle
English
1348English replaces Latin as the language of instruction in most schools
1362English replaces French as the language of law. English is used in Parliament for the first time
c1388Chaucer starts writing The Canterbury Tales
c1400The Great Vowel Shift begins
1476William Caxton establishes the first English printing pressEarly
Modern
English
1564Shakespeare is born
1604Table Alphabeticall, the first English dictionary, is published
1607The first permanent English settlement in the New World (Jamestown) is established
1616Shakespeare dies
1623Shakespeare's First Folio is published
1702The first daily English-language newspaper, The Daily Courant, is published in London
1755Samuel Johnson publishes his English dictionary
1776Thomas Jefferson writes the American Declaration of Independence
1782Britain abandons its colonies in what is later to become the USA
1828Webster publishes his American English dictionaryLate
Modern
English
1922The British Broadcasting Corporation is founded
1928The Oxford English Dictionary is published

jueves, 10 de mayo de 2018

NIGHTMARISH PLASTIC

NIGHTMARISH PLASTIC

We should but can t get rid of plastic, one of the major pollutants of our time

https://www.ecowatch.com/22-facts-about-plastic-pollution-and-10-things-we-can-do-about-it-1881885971.html

viernes, 20 de abril de 2018

THE DEMS ARE FILING LAWSUIT AGAINST WHOM ?

THE CEI C65 WRITES :

Hillary Clinton looked the prospective president of the United States, but something went wrong
Trump won the elections amidst a lot of suspicions that they were rigged
Soon later, accusations against Trump mounted and several members of his cabinet were forced to resign
Trump is suspected to have tilted the election results in his favour and the Democrats hit the roof
They are not prepared to tolerate having lost when they in fact didn t Hillary , as a matter of fact, got the most votes .

READ ON .....

This is some news from THE WASHINGTON POST

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democratic-party-files-lawsuit-alleging-russia-the-trump-campaign-and-wikileaks-conspired-to-disrupt-the-2016-campaign/2018/04/20/befe8364-4418-11e8-8569-26fda6b404c7_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.eaea766a5d4c&wpisrc=al_news__alert-politics--alert-national&wpmk=1


martes, 10 de abril de 2018

MARK ZUCKERBERG AT CAPITOL HILL



AN ACT OF CONTRITION  -   IS THAT ENOUGH ?

CAN HE REPAIR ALL THE DAMAGE DONE ?
CAN IT REALLY BE FIXED ?



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/04/09/facebook-chief-executive-mark-zuckerberg-to-captiol-hill-it-was-my-mistake-and-im-sorry/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.8b4a154f0502&wpisrc=al_news__alert-politics--alert-national&wpmk=1

DATA ABUSE BOUNTY THE LATEST ON FACEBOOK

Our questions is

BREACH OF PRIVACY

Should FACEBOOK ONLY CARRY THE BLAME ?

Read the article and discuss the importance of this new activity of FACEBOOK

https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/04/data-abuse-bounty/

martes, 3 de abril de 2018

THE FUTURE OF FIREARMS

AMERICANS, GUNS, AND THE FUTURE
Dick Metcalf has been shooting since kindergarten, a member of the NRA since middle school.  He’s been studying, writing, and teaching about firearms for over 40 years. But Metcalf’s long career as a columnist with Guns & Ammo magazine came to an abrupt halt in late 2013 after he penned a column that explored the line between firearm regulation and Second Amendment infringement. The backlash was quick and complete from what Metcalf calls the “radical extremists” of the firearms movement, a movement he’s always considered himself a part of.  Join Dick Metcalf and The Atlantic’s Ron Brownstein for a conversation about guns, culture,